Saturday, February 29, 2020

The Legal and the Reliance

Do religious leaders see the legality of their decisions in procuring possible accusations from innocent considerations to their religious order?

Are you accepting these candidates unassured that the application process is not offering you trustworthy persons?

Are you accusing or finding your numbers will never be accused?

Case # 1:

What are the present conditions and evident signs that brought you to accept the candidacy of Meryl Viola Bravo?

Meryl Viola Bravo was received into the congregation of the Carmelite Sisters of the Most Sacred Heart of Los Angeles in February 1997.  She was received through a board and council of members in the religious order and the evident signs of a religious vocation was received to be an authentic care to her dignity and call as a baptized Christian.

We had a relationship with Meryl Viola Bravo in the year 1994 at the age of 15 years old up to her entrance through a very distinctive consideration of a junior auxiliary program in her ability to live and share with the religious congregation the responsibilities of their apostolate.

It was clear to the board and council of members of her capacity to reach the instruction and formation well at the age of 18 years old.

There were very clear and open forms of communication that her entrance was not fully supported by persons outside of the religious congregation and these persons were members of her family.

Meryl Viola Bravo had discovered that the difficulty of acceptance that came these members who found her entrance disagreeable were members of personal interest on the conditions that found her alive and well and thus, we concluded the matter in sharing with her family members that she is, indeed, finding rest here.  However, her degree of co-behavioral condition tells us there is something very different in her manner of communication.  It is a development of marital union with the Divine Bridegroom. 

Meryl Viola Bravo ~