If a mayor wants more police and less homeless, how does he see the police remedying the concern for the difficult housing applications that have come to their jurisdiction? Does a residential address necessarily mean less commodities of people unknown by a residential care to return to during hours when streets and roads should be clear of unknown causes?
The Law of Protection
1. The common good of the whole county and city is the safety of all persons. When is safety performed for all persons at the right conduct before a physical act of restraint is placed on a person?
2. Are the persons neglected into the streets the danger?
3. As a mayor proposes "Less Homeless More Police," is he performing the protection of the "homeless" or the residential persons who fail to house them?
4. At the right rate of determining the level of transient and unknown housing is the identity of the person located before a presumed arrest is performed on the person?
5. What is police as the gear is defense while the civil discord does not gear a defense except a response to protect what police are defending? What do the police defend as the common good?
6. How does "More Police" offer an incentive to "Less Homeless"? What actions of protection for the community offer an action of housing for all people of the residential area and jurisdiction of businesses and public entities of service?
